right here its exactly the different.its the most boring to watch a 30-hits-rally everytime especially on the holy grass.players arent rewarded for good shots anymore becuase the opponent can dig out everything from far behind the lines.
serve and volley is the holy grail of tennis for me despite i like rafa so much.
theres no difference between roland garros and wimbledon anymore and thats what is boring to me.i prefer different set-ups and not the same-old-same-old rallys like ferrer or djokovic do all the time,rafa too.grand slam (meaning winning on all 4 turfs ) is also diluted because one type of player can easily win every grand slam title.....
pat cash and muster made true statements about wimbledon in the last issue of tennis mag
cash : "no rewards for good shots anymore and a tendency to slow a once fast game."
muster is style as usual :" wimbledon??--you mean the third and fourth weeks of rolland garros???"